Drawing for TRUCKBOSS

USPTO serial 78418029

TRUCKBOSS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUCKBOSS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Sigalow

David L. Sigalow Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A.255 S. Orange AvenueSuite 1401Orlando, FL 32801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Global position satellite vehicle monitoring equipment and electronic component parts of global positioning satellite vehicle monitoring equipment, namely, sensors for monitoring vehicle operation and location, transmitters, namely, electronic transmitters for use in broadcasting signals and information by wireless media, antennae, computer hardware, namely monitors and CPU processors; and computer software for use with global positioning satellite vehicle monitoring equipment for monitoring and tracking of the location and vital systems of motor vehiclesACTIVE—
035Wholesale distributorship services in the field of truck location monitoring systems; licensing of truck location monitoring systems; and retail store services in the field of truck location monitoring systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 23, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 23, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance