USPTO serial 78418122
METRO-KHAKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with METRO-KHAKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Stonehill
ROBERT STONEHILL SILVERBERG STONEHILL & GOLDSMITH PC111 W 40TH STNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | All clothing namely-- jeans, pants, trousers, slacks, shorts, overalls; skirts, casual dresses or jumpers; shirts, blouses, t-shirts, knit or woven shirts, pullovers, sweaters; vests, jackets, and coats; bandanas, hats, caps; belts, suspenders; socks, shoes, boots, and other footwear | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |