USPTO serial 78418326
CUISINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUISINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip H. Gottfried
PHILIP H GOTTFRIED AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVE 21ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | all-purpose cleaners; all-purpose cleaning preparations; anti-bacterial soap; bath beads; bath crystals; bath foam; bath gel; bath lotion; bath oil; bath pearls; bath powder; body cream; body emulsions; body oil; body powder; body scrub; body sprays; bubble bath; cologne; dish detergents; dish washing detergents; eau de cologne; eau de parfum; eau de toilette; essential oils for personal use; fragrant emitting wicks for room fragrance; fragrances for personal use; hair cleaning room fragrance; fragrances for personal use; hair cleaning preparations; hand cream; hand lotions; hand soaps; household cleaning preparations; incense; lip gloss; liquid soaps for hands, face and body; lotions for skin, hair, face and body; non-medicated bath salts; non-medicated hair care preparations; non-medicated lip balm; massage oil; perfume; perfume oils; potpourri; room fragrances; sachets; sachet-like eye pillows containing fragrances; scented body spray; scented ceramic stones; scented linen sprays; scented room sprays; shampoos; shampoo-conditioners; shower gel; skin lotion; skin moisturizer; skin soap; soaps; toilet soap; toilet water | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | candles and scented candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | and air deodorant; air deodorizer; air fresheners; anti-bacterial hand wash; car deodorant; car deodorizer; disinfecting hand wash; insect repellant in candle form; household deodorant; household deodorizer; room deodorants; room deodorizing compositions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 4, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |