USPTO serial 78418628
INTEGRA VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGRA VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John T. Winburn
JOHN T WINBURN BSH HOME APPLIANCES CORPORATION100 BOSCH BLVDNEW BERN, NC 28562UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric kitchen machines and equipment for domestic food and beverage preparation and processing, namely mincing machines, mixing and kneading machines, pressing machines, juice extractors, juice centrifuges, grinders, slicing machines, and parts therefore; electric motor-driven tools, namely, electric can openers, knife sharpeners and parts therefore; electric waste disposal units, namely, waste masticators and compressors and parts therefore; dishwashers and parts therefore; electric machines and appliances for treating laundry and clothing, namely, washing machines, laundry presses, clothes ironing machines and parts therefore; electric cleaning equipment for household use, namely, window cleaning machines, shoe cleaning machines and parts therefore; vacuum cleaners and parts therefore, namely, vacuum cleaner hoses, pipes, dust filters and dust filter bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |