USPTO serial 78418658
CONTRACTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTRACTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. MacMillan
RICHARD S MACMILLAN MACMILLAN, SOBANSKI & TODD LLCONE MARITIME PLZ 4TH FL 720 WATERTOLEDO, OH 43604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal tool boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | engine driven electricity generators, wood lathes, power driven bench grinders, drill presses, electric cordless drills, electric hand-held grinders, power tools, namely, power operated sheet sanders, power operated table saws, power operated cut-off saws, power operated jig saws, power operated hammer drills, power operated circular saws, power operated reciprocating saws, power operated sanders, power operated grinding wheels, and power operated abrasive wheels, electric welding machines, and electric arc-welding machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | hand tools, namely, hammers, screwdrivers, wrenches, socket sets, and pliers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | freestanding and wall mounted tool racks, tool cabinets, non-metal tool boxes, shelves, stationary and portable work benches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |