Drawing for FREDERICA

USPTO serial 78418679

FREDERICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREDERICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph Molko

JOSEPH MOLKO C/O ANTHONY ORTIZ 1515 BROADWAY 51ST FLOVIACOM INTERNATIONAL INCNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded sound and video recordings featuring entertainment in the nature of comedic television series, theatrical productions and music on compact discs, video cassettes and DVDs; sunglasses; magnets; wireless mobile phone equipment and accessories, namely, telephones, battery chargers, cell phone cases, headsets, holsters for carrying cell phones, mobile phone face plates; downloadable ring tones, music recordings, MP3 files, graphics and video images via a global computer network and wireless mobile communication devicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Sep 6, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 20, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 22, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Jan 22, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 22, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 17, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Aug 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 12, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 17, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance