USPTO serial 78418871
BG GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3850112Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2010
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BG GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BG Intellectual Property Limited
Reading, GB
BG Intellectual Property Limited
Reading, GB
BG Intellectual Property Limited
Reading, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells, PA92 E. Main Street., Suite 302Somerville, NJ 08876UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | methane | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | Gaseous hydrocarbon fuels, namely, ethane, propane, pentane, natural gas; hydrocarbon condensates, natural gas, combustible mineral oils, namely, crude oils; liquefied natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, natural gas; electricity, namely, electrical energy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Communications and telemetry services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions; Cellular communications services, namely, cellular telephone communication; Mobile communications services, namely, mobile telephone communication; Digital communications services, namely, wireless digital messaging services; Satellite transmission services; Communications by fiber optic networks; Electronic transmission of messages and data; Remote data access services, namely, provision of access to data or documents stored electronically in central files for remote consultation; Electronic data interchange services, namely, electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks; Transmission of information, namely, data transmission and reception services via telecommunication means; Electronic mail services; Database information services, namely, transmission of database information via telecommunications networks; Provision of telecommunication access; Providing on-line communications links which transfer the website user to other local and global web pages; Providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; Data communications services, namely, data communication by electronic mail; Communication by computer terminals; Transmission of data from remote locations to mobile telephones, namely, local and long distance transmission of data by means of telephone; On-line information services, namely, on-line document delivery via a global computer network; Telephone messaging services, namely, telephone voice messaging services; Rental of telecommunications apparatus, installations and instruments; Paging services; Call screening services, namely, intercepting and preventing unsolicited calls from telemarketers; Telecommunication services, namely, call re-routing services; Electronic multiple message sending services; Electronic voice messaging, namely, call recording services by telephone; Facsimile transmission services; Call barring services, namely, intercepting and preventing unsolicited calls from telemarketers; Telecommunication and dissemination of information in audio or visual form, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; Telecommunication services relating to the receipt, processing, storage, display, recording, retrieval or transmission of data; Providing access to computer databases, namely, provision of access to data or documents stored electronically in central files for remote consultation; Providing access to online computer services, namely, providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; call diversion, namely, intercepting and preventing unsolicited calls from telemarketers and forwarding of calls to other locations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BG Intellectual Property Limited
- Other trademarks owned by BG Intellectual Property Limited
- Other trademarks owned by BG Intellectual Property Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named BG GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | RG1B | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REQUEST TO DELETE 1(B) FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |