Drawing for WELLSPRING RANCH THE HORSE'S CHOICE WR 423

USPTO serial 78419023

WELLSPRING RANCH THE HORSE'S CHOICE WR 423

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WELLSPRING RANCH THE HORSE'S CHOICE WR 423?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Brewer and Paige W. Mills

Robert L. Brewer and Paige W. Mills Bass, Berry & Sims PLCSuite 2700315 Deaderick StreetNashville, TN 37238

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003equine care products, namely, non-medicated shampoos, non-medicated conditioners, non-medicated gels for the hoof, non-medicated hoof conditioners, antibacterial soaps, and non-medicated skin and coat cleansersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 26, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 26, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 5, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 21, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 7, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 7, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 7, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 30, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 30, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 29, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION
Jan 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 6, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 28, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 1, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance