Drawing for BIG WEENIES ARE BETTER

USPTO serial 78419058

BIG WEENIES ARE BETTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG WEENIES ARE BETTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cara R. Burns

CARA R BURNS CARA R BURNS725 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2280LOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely men's, women's and children's shirts, T-shirts, sweat shirts, golf shirts, jackets, jerseys, pants, sweat pants, tank tops, shorts, headwear, swim wear, socks and night wearACTIVE—
043Restaurant Services, including Take-OutACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance