Drawing for ZOOYA

USPTO serial 78419221

ZOOYA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZOOYA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Kroll

MICHAEL J KROLL DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 S 6TH ST STE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Wastepaper baskets; earring organizer board; exfoliating mitts and pads; perfume atomizers; recipe boxes; vases; hair combs; hair brushes; compacts sold empty; fitted vanity casesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 25, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Oct 25, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 9, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 13, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance