Drawing for GUIDEDCHOICE

USPTO serial 78420056

GUIDEDCHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GUIDEDCHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. Ottaviani

John E. Ottaviani Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLPF.D.R. StationP.O. Box 130New York, NY 10150

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035consumer directed consultations in the field of pharmacy benefits and healthcare cost and utilization reviewACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 27, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 20, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 15, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Dec 19, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance