USPTO serial 78420120
INTERTRANSFERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2005
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTERTRANSFERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jose A. Martins
Jose A. Martins Intertranfers, Inc.261 N.E. 1st StreetMIAMI, FL 33132UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER; CURRENCY EXCHANGE, MONEY REMITTANCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Jan 26, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Sep 13, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | โ |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Mar 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Mar 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| May 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |