USPTO serial 78420180
RANCHLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RANCHLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George S. Gray
GEORGE S GRAY ATTORNEYP O BOX 270190CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78427-0190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | ANIMAL FEED | ABANDONED | Jul 28, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |