USPTO serial 78420363
PCANTISPAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PCANTISPAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for protecting individual computer users and servers from receiving unsolicited bulk e-mail by tagging, flagging, blocking, deleting, highlighting or otherwise automatically processing such messages; Messages are filtered against specific technical criteria such as public, proprietary and private, user-defined or peer-to-peer defined blacklists and whitelists; The blacklists and whitelists contain information on servers, IP ranges, e-mail addresses, domain names, language patterns, e-mail header patterns, known methods of e-mail header falsification, and other technical criteria | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |