Drawing for IMAGEMOTION

USPTO serial 78420759

IMAGEMOTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IMAGEMOTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn S. Fruchter

LYNN S FRUCHTER COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATION SERVICES RENDERED IN CONNECTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION AND/OR POST-PRODUCTION OF VISUAL EFFECTS AND ANIMATION FOR MOTION PICTURES, TELEVISION PROGRAMS, VIDEOGAMES AND OTHER VISUAL MEDIA, NAMELY, MOTION CAPTURE SERVICES FOR TRANSLATING MOVEMENT OF A REAL SUBJECT AND MAPPING SUCH MOVEMENT ONTO OR AS A COMPUTER GENERATED SUBJECTACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE DESIGN SERVICES, FOR OTHERS, IN THE FIELD OF VISUAL EFFECTS AND ANIMATION FOR MOTION PICTURES, TELEVISION PROGRAMS, VIDEOGAMES AND OTHER VISUAL MEDIA, NAMELY, MOTION CAPTURE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES FOR TRANSLATING MOVEMENT OF A REAL SUBJECT AND MAPPING SUCH MOVEMENT ONTO OR AS A COMPUTER GENERATED SUBJECTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2008CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 27, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 27, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 6, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 5, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 8, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance