USPTO serial 78420769
THE LINK BETWEEN US
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE LINK BETWEEN US?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Long
JOAN L LONG MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLPPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication and information technology services, namely, electric, digital, cellular and wireless transmission of voice, data, information images, signals and messages and transmission of voice, data, images, audio, video and information via telephone, television and global communication networks; providing telecommunications connections over a global communications network, electronic mail, voice mail and messaging services, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; rental of telecommunications equipment, namely, equipment for electronic access to global telecommunications network, equipment for transmitting, receiving, recording and monitoring voice, data, information images, signals, messages comprised of data and word processors, and telecommunications hardware components and peripherals thereof for use in the telecommunications industry, and rental of equipment for transmitting, receiving, recording and monitoring computer programs for use in operating and accessing telecommunications systems; audio and video broadcasting featuring entertainment in the nature of live visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; providing multiple-user dial-up and dedicated access to the internet; personal communications services; pager services; transmission and broadcast of audio and video programming; leasing of telecommunications equipment, components and systems; consulting in the field of telecommunications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |