Drawing for MAXICARD

USPTO serial 78420801

MAXICARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3282344Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2007
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXICARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Adams

MICHAEL D. ADAMS MAYER BROWN LLP71 South Wacker DriveCHICAGO, IL 60606-4637UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer programming services for others; rental of computer software and hardware for online access; data encryption services, namely, administration of digital keys and digital certificates; application service provider, namely, hosting computer software applications for others, hosting of digital content on the internet; hosting the websites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer services, namely, creating indexes of information available on computer networks; consulting and design services in the field of information technology, computer programming and global communication networks; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; technical project planning services related to telecommunications equipment; providing entertainment information and general information at the specific request of end-users by means of telephone or global communications networks; design, development and implementation of software for use in the telecommunications industry; providing information via the telephone and global communication networks in the field of information technology.SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2014C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Mar 8, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 21, 2014C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Feb 21, 2014ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 30, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 30, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 18, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 21, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance