USPTO serial 78421100
NUTRAGENICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUTRAGENICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. Morley Drucker, Esq.
I MORLEY DRUCKER ESQ FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLP6060 CTR DR TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the fields of cosmetics, cosmeceuticals, skin care products, hair care products and delivery systems for same, therapeutic products, enzymes, nutritional supplements, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, and COQ lO supplements and other supplements as additives to the foregoing products; COQ lO supplements; and foods and beverages and additives for same; promoting the goods and services of others through on-line ordering, print advertising, and cataloging of those goods and services in the fields of cosmetics, cosmeceuticals, skin care products, hair care products and delivery systems for same, therapeutic products, enzymes, nutritional supplements, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, and COQ 10 supplements and other supplements as additives to the foregoing products; COQ lO supplements; and foods and beverages and additives; direct marketing advertising for others in the fields of cosmetics, cosmeceuticals, skin care products, hair care products and delivery systems for same, therapeutic products, enzymes, nutritional supplements, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, and COQ 10 supplements and other supplements as additives to the foregoing products; COQ 10 supplements; and foods and beverages and additives for same | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |