USPTO serial 78421542
MANAGED BUSINESS FLEXIBILITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MANAGED BUSINESS FLEXIBILITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Long
JOAN L LONG MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLPPO BOX 2882CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, insurance brokerage, insurance claims processing; Financial services, namely, clearing of secure financial transactions through online services; financial analysis and consultation; financial information provided by electronic means; financial information processing; financial portfolio management; financial services, namely, securities consulting and safe keeping; financial sponsorship of sports, educational and entertainment programs and events; commercial lending services; monetary exchange; credit card services; telephone calling card services; electronic commerce services, namely, electronic debit and credit card transaction processing services, funds transfer and bill payment-processing services; discount brokerage services; security brokerage; brokerage in the field of insurance, stocks, commodities; custom brokerage for third parties in the field of insurance, stocks, commodities; brokerage of shares and venture capital funding services to start-up companies; brokerage of fund shares; brokerage of productive investment of funds; real estate services, namely, brokerage, management, leasing, and appraisal of real property; consulting services relating to insurance services, namely, providing information and brokerage of insurances in the field of home insurance, accident insurance and health insurance; consulting services relating to bank services; providing information via the telephone and the global communication networks in the field of finance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |