Drawing for MANAGED BUSINESS FLEXIBILITY

USPTO serial 78421544

MANAGED BUSINESS FLEXIBILITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MANAGED BUSINESS FLEXIBILITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan L. Long

JOAN L LONG MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLPPO BOX 2882CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication and information technology services, namely, electric, digital, cellular and wireless transmission of voice, data, information images, signals and messages and transmission of voice, data, images, audio, video and information via telephone, television and global communication networks; providing telecommunications connections over a global communications network, electronic mail, voice mail and messaging services, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; rental of telecommunications equipment, namely, equipment for electronic access to global telecommunications network, equipment for transmitting, receiving, recording and monitoring voice, data, information images, signals, messages comprised of data and word processors, and telecommunications hardware components and peripherals thereof for use in the telecommunications industry, and rental of equipment for transmitting, receiving, recording and monitoring computer programs for use in operating and accessing telecommunications systems; audio and video broadcasting featuring entertainment in the nature of live visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; providing multiple-user dial-up and dedicated access to the internet; personal communications services; pager services; transmission and broadcast of audio and video programming; leasing of telecommunications equipment, components and systems; consulting in the field of telecommunicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 12, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 3, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 2, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance