CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SAISON

USPTO serial 78421890

SAISON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAISON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys; goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, precious metal jewelry; precious metals, namely gold, silver and platinum; jewelry, namely, gold, silver and platinum jewelry; precious and semi-precious stones; horological instruments in the nature of clocks and watchesACTIVE—
035Retail outlets and wholesale distributorships featuring jewelry, precious metals, precious and semi-precious stones; mail order services featuring jewelry, precious metals, precious stones and semi-precious stones; computerized on-line retail store services in the field of jewelry, precious metals, precious and semi-precious stonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance