Drawing for VERIFIABLY BETTER BEEF

USPTO serial 78421908

VERIFIABLY BETTER BEEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VERIFIABLY BETTER BEEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent H. Borges

KENT H BORGES SPARKS WILLSON BORGES BRANDT & JOHNSON24 S WEBER ST STE 400COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029BeefABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 13, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 13, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 7, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance