USPTO serial 78422261
ROTATING TEASER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2005
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROTATING TEASER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Traverse City, MI
Traverse City, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas S. Bishop
DOUGLAS S BISHOP BISHOP & HEINTZ PC440 W FRONT AT OAK ST PO BOX 70TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49685-0707UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Sporting goods, namely fishing tackle | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 27, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 31, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |