Drawing for OPRAH'S 21ST CENTURY SCHOOLS

USPTO serial 78422294

OPRAH'S 21ST CENTURY SCHOOLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPRAH'S 21ST CENTURY SCHOOLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey C. Katz

Jeffrey C. Katz DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BroadwayNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing educational scholarships; charitable fundraising services, namely, encouraging donations for educational and health purposesACTIVE—
041Operating schools and other learning centers featuring primary and secondary grade levels; educational services, namely, development of curricula for schools and learning centers; providing educational services, namely providing courses of instruction at the primary and secondary grade level via schools and other learning centers; providing educational services, namely, conducting classes in the field of health education via schools and other learning centersACTIVE—
044HEALTH SERVICES, NAMELY, ARRANGING FOR HEALTHCARE SERVICES FOR CHILDRENACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 15, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 6, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance