Drawing for CAFE GETAWAY

USPTO serial 78422315

CAFE GETAWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAFE GETAWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott B. Schwartz

SCOTT B SCHWARTZ COZEN O'CONNORTRADEMARK/COPYRIGHT GROUP1900 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043restaurant services in business and industrial facilities, and in hospitals and health care facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 1, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 14, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 12, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Feb 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 17, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 17, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 19, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance