USPTO serial 78422556
DR. BROOKS'
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3545037Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 9, 2008
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DR. BROOKS'?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ST. LOUIS, MO
TRILOGY HEALTH CARE COMPANY, L.L.C.
ST. LOUIS, MO
Other trademarks owned by TRILOGY HEALTH CARE COMPANY, L.L.C.
Creve Coeur, MO
Creve Coeur, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William D. O'Neill
William D. O'Neill Senniger Powers LLP100 North Broadway, 17th floorSt. Louis, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | shoe inserts for medical and therapeutic purposes, namely, insoles, heel pads, orthotic inserts for the foot, supports for the arch of the foot, pads for wound care application and skin coverage of the foot and other areas of the body | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BROOKS, JEFFREY S.
- Other trademarks owned by TRILOGY HEALTH CARE COMPANY, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Jeffrey S. Brooks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jeffrey S. Brooks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DR. BROOKS INNOVATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DR. BROOKS INNOVATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named DR. BROOKS'
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |