Drawing for POLAR FROST WITH ALOE VERA PAIN RELIEVING GEL

USPTO serial 78422631

POLAR FROST WITH ALOE VERA PAIN RELIEVING GEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3166058Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 31, 2006
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLAR FROST WITH ALOE VERA PAIN RELIEVING GEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Julie B. Seyler ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medicated topical cold gel ointment for pharmaceutical use in pain reliefSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2008C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Oct 24, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 14, 2008CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Dec 11, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 31, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 21, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 22, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 25, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 25, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 4, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 23, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance