Drawing for Serial No. 78422800

USPTO serial 78422800

Serial No. 78422800

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78422800?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristofer E. Halvorson

KRISTOFER E HALVORSON THE HALVORSON LAW FIRM1757 E BASELINE RD STE 130GILBERT, AZ 85233UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software, namely, PC-based and device dedicated software with database to archive the data and images from the medical devices, and to graphically present above data with a graphic interface; medical software for PC-based and device dedicated software to analyze output data and images from medical devices and for signal and data processing to provide the non-invasive diagnostic information for the above devices on non-invasive medical monitoring vital signs and imaging applicationsACTIVE—
010Medical devices, namely, non-invasive medical diagnostic and vital sign monitoring apparatus, namely, automated blood pressure devices, vital signs monitors, and intracranial ultrasound apparatus; medical imaging devices, namely, CT, MRI, ultrasound, positron emission tomography (PET), and x-ray apparatus; medical diagnostic equipment, namely, non-invasive medical diagnostic and vital signs monitoring equipment, namely, 2-Dimensional, 3-Dimensional and 4-Dimensional imaging systems, CT, MRI, ultrasound, positron emission tomography (PET), and x-ray equipment; medical diagnostic system technologies, namely non-invasive medial diagnostic and vital sign monitoring technologies, namely CT, MRI, ultrasound, positron emission tomography (PET), and x-ray apparatus; medical imaging equipment, namely x-ray diagnostic apparatus, CT diagnostic apparatus, MRI diagnostic apparatus, and ultrasound diagnostic apparatusACTIVE—
042custom development, creation, and enhancement of medical equipment, namely, custom design, development, and testing of medical equipment; software consulting for medical applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 26, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 20, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 19, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance