USPTO serial 78422905
LA ARROLLADORA BANDA EL LIMON DE RENE CAMACHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LA ARROLLADORA BANDA EL LIMON DE RENE CAMACHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MAZATLAN, SINALOA, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC1314 Texas, 21st FloorHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs, software and operating systems for the recording of sound and video, interactive video game programs featuring music; digital and analog cameras, video cameras, digital and analog video recorders, digital and analog audio recorders; blank video tapes, blank magnetic data carriers, blank compact discs, blank computer discs, blank digital video discs; musical sound recordings featuring musical performances, video sound recordings featuring musical performances; pre-recorded compact discs, phonograph records, audio cassette tapes, video tapes, CD-ROM, laser discs and digital video discs featuring music; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines, books, and newsletters in the field of music; downloadable sound recordings featuring music, downloadable video recordings featuring music | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 1988 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shorts, shirts, t-shirts, swimsuits, blouses, skirts, scarves, gloves, pants, sweaters, jerseys, socks, jackets, suits, training suits, vests, neckties, belts, suspenders, dresses, coats, raincoats, overcoats, smocks, underwear, pajamas, brassieres, corsets, slips, lingerie; headwear, namely, hats, caps and berets; footwear, namely, boots, sandals, shoes and slippers | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 1988 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, live performances and appearances by a music and vocal group, and live performances and appearances featuring prerecorded music by a music and vocal group; fan club services; providing an Internet website featuring entertainment information about a music and vocal group, namely, music reviews, articles, interviews, music videos, music charts, personal biographies, diaries, information on music instruments, tour dates, games, trivia, access to memorabilia, photographs, video clips, and audio clips, all available via a global computer network; music composition for others, music publishing services, music production services | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Perez, Rene Camacho
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LA ARROLLADORA BANDA EL LIMON DE RENE CAMACHO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |