Drawing for STAVERSA

USPTO serial 78423300

STAVERSA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAVERSA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne H. Peck, John W. Crittenden, Janet L. Cullum, Andrew Hartman, Kent M. Walker, Peter J. Willsey, Britt L. Anderson, Adam L. Barea, Keith J. Berets, Susan D. Berney-Key, Todd S. Bontemps, Francine M. Hanson, Lisa K. Koenig and Gretchen R. Stroud

ANNE H PECK, JOHN W CRITTENDEN, JANET COOLEY GODWARD LLP3000 EL CAMINO REAL BLDG 5PALO ALTO SQ 4TH FLPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2155

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of endocrine disordersACTIVE—
010medical products, devices and apparatus, namely medical syringes, injection devices and injection pens and cartridgesACTIVE—
042medical research; new product research; research and development for new products for others; scientific research; chemical research; biological research; scientific research in the field of genetics and genetic engineeringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 2005CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance