USPTO serial 78424270
COZMO GIRLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COZMO GIRLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Anhua Zhouli Industry Development (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.
BaoAn, Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Anhua Zhouli Industry Development (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.
Anhua Zhouli Industry Development (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.
BaoAn, Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Anhua Zhouli Industry Development (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Color cosmetics namely lipstick, lip gloss, lip pencil, eye shadow, eye pencil, blush, pressed face powder, shimmer face powder, mascara, nail polish | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anhua Zhouli Industry Development (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Anhua Zhouli Industry Development (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named COZMO GIRLS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |