Drawing for BEMA

USPTO serial 78424675

BEMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3473621Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 22, 2008
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with BEMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maury M. Tepper, III

Maury M. Tepper, III Tepper & Eyster, PLLC3724 Benson DriveRaleigh, NC 27609UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Polymer film, namely, adhesive bandages for topical application of pharmaceuticalsACTIVEAug 18, 2001
010Drug delivery system using a polymer film applicator for delivery of pharmaceuticalsACTIVEAug 18, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 5, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 18, 2018NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2018RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 18, 201889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 18, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 3, 2018E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2015NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 20158.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 19, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 7, 2015ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 17, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 29, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 13, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 13, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 13, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 13, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 28, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 28, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 20, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 9, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2005GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance