USPTO serial 78424853
ACME HUMBLE PIE CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACME HUMBLE PIE CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George F. Kondor
GEORGE F KONDOR OYEN WIGGS GREEN & MUTALA480 601 W CORDOVA STVANCOVER, BRISTISH COLUMBIA, CANADA,,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | baked goods namely pies and brownies | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |