Drawing for PCR FAMILY WEALTH

USPTO serial 78424965

PCR FAMILY WEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PCR FAMILY WEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Henry N. Wixon

HENRY N WIXON WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LL1455 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Publication of monthly newsletters featuring aggregated economic data of high net worth individuals for use by othersACTIVEMay 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2008MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Mar 17, 2008ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jul 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 27, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 14, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 9, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance