USPTO serial 78425545
SOFTPOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOFTPOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID J. CHO
DAVID J CHO AT&T CORPONE AT&T WAYBEDMINSTER, NJ 07921-1752UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, LOCAL, LONG DISTANCE, AND INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE, CABLE, INTERNET AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSION; FRAME RELAY TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING FRAME RELAY CONNECTIVITY SERVICES FOR DATA TRANSFER; VIRTUAL NETWORK TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC MAIL AND VOICE MAIL MESSAGING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC DATA TRANSMISSION PACKET SERVICES; COMPUTER AIDED TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES; AUDIO AND VIDEO TELECONFERENCING SERVICES; PRIVATE LINE VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA BY MEANS OF PRIVATE LINE TELEPHONE; INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK (ISDN) TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA VIA SATELLITE, TERRESTRIAL AND UNDERSEA TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINKS; TELEVISION TRANSMISSION SERVICES; 800 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; 900 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; SWITCHED VOICE, DATA, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA SERVICES, NAMELY, WORLDWIDE SWITCHED AND INTERNET TEXT AND MESSAGE TRANSMISSION SERVICES; ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER MODE (ATM) SERVICES; LOCATION INDEPENDENT PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPRISING MOBILE, VOICE, DATA AND FACSIMILE SERVICES; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO WORLDWIDE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKS, ON-LINE SERVICES AND BULLETIN BOARDS; PROVIDING THE RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION FROM GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKS, ON-LINE SERVICES AND BULLETIN BOARDS; PROVIDING BACK BONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SERVICES TO OTHERS TO ENABLE THEM TO DISPLAY CONTENT ON WORLDWIDE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKS, ON-LINE SERVICES AND BULLETIN BOARDS; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO ON-LINE INFORMATION SERVICES; THE TRANSMISSION OVER CABLE OF ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES AND VOICE, VIDEO, DATA AND FACSIMILE TELEPHONY SERVICE; ALL OF THE FOREGOING ARE NOT RELATED TO ANY MUSICAL STYLE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T KNOWLEDGE VENTURES II, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named SOFTPOP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |