CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SENSOPOP

USPTO serial 78425552

SENSOPOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSOPOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID J. CHO

DAVID J CHO AT&T CORPONE AT&T WAYBEDMINSTER, NJ 07921-1752UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, LOCAL, LONG DISTANCE AND INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE, CABLE, INTERNET AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSIONS; FRAME RELAY TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING FRAME RELAY CONNECTIVITY SERVICES FOR DATA TRANSFER; VIRTUAL NETWORK TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC MAIL AND VOICE MAIL MESSAGING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC DATA TRANSMISSION PACKET SERVICES; COMPUTER-AIDED TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES; AUDIO AND VIDEO TELECONFERENCING SERVICES; THE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA RELATING TO SIGHT, SOUND, SMELL, TOUCH AND TASTE; PRIVATE LINE VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA BY MEANS OF PRIVATE LINE TELEPHONE; INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK (ISDN) TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA VIA SATELLITE, TERRESTRIAL AND UNDERSEA TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINKS; TELEVISION TRANSMISSION SERVICES; 800 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; 900 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; SWITCHED VOICE, DATA, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA SERVICES, NAMELY, WORLDWIDE SWITCHED AND INTERNET TEXT AND MESSAGE TRANSMISSION SERVICES; ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER MODE (ATM) SERVICES; LOCATION INDEPENDENT PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPRISING MOBILE, VOICE, DATA AND FACSIMILE SERVICES; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO WORLDWIDE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKS, ON-LINE SERVICES AND BULLETIN BOARDS; PROVIDING BACK BONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SERVICES TO OTHERS TO ENABLE THEM TO DISPLAY CONTENT ON WORLDWDIE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKS, ON-LINE SERVICES AND BULLETIN BOARDS; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO ON-LINE INFORMATION SERVICES; THE TRANSMISSION OVER CABLE OF ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES AND VOICE, VIDEO, DATA AND FACSIMILE TELEPHONY SERVICEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 20, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 3, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance