Drawing for APX OUR KNOWLEDGE IS POWER

USPTO serial 78425592

APX OUR KNOWLEDGE IS POWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APX OUR KNOWLEDGE IS POWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn M. Humphreys

LYNN M HUMPHREYS MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Coordination services for others for the purchase, sale, and delivery of electrical power and ancillary services, namely, replacement energy and capacity; scheduling the delivery of wholesale electrical power for others; providing on-line databases in the field of wholesale electricity, scheduling and settlementABANDONED—
042Providing online non-downloadable software applications in the field of wholesale electricity, scheduling and settlement; providing technical consulting services in the field of IT infrastructure development, custom software development and technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems for others in the field of wholesale electricityABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2009MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 25, 2009ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 18, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 17, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 28, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 9, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 23, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 8, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance