USPTO serial 78425759
JMJ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JMJ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie T. Perry
PO BOX 504 102 HWY 45 S.WINTON, NC 27986-0504UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | audio disks featuring music, audio speaker enclosures, amplifiers, audio mixers, audio speakers, audio tape recorders, phonograph record players, CD players, compact disk cases, DVD machines, DVD's featuring music, musical sound recordings, musical video recordings, motion picture films featuring documentaries about entertainers and the entertainment industry; motion picture films featuring entertainers' life stories and/or fictional dramatic stories about entertainers and the entertainment industry, documentaries about music entertainers and the music industry recorded on video cassettes, video tapes, motion picture film, laser discs, and DVD's; pre-recorded audio cassettes featuring music, pre-recorded digital audio tapes featuring music, pre-recorded video cassettes, video tapes, CD's, laser disks, and DVD's all featuring music, computer programs for creating, composing, playing and performing music; computer game software, computer game discs, computer game programs, and computer game cartridges, downloadable computer games, computer screen saver software, computer software for music production, computer graphics software, computer software to enhance audio-visual capabilities of multimedia, electric signs, sunglasses, telephones, cell phones, magnetically encoded pre-paid calling cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | music publishing services; music audio recording services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2008 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |