Drawing for HEIDI'S HEAVENLY COOKIES THEY'RE SINFULLY DELICIOUS

USPTO serial 78425871

HEIDI'S HEAVENLY COOKIES THEY'RE SINFULLY DELICIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3001367Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 27, 2005
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with HEIDI'S HEAVENLY COOKIES THEY'RE SINFULLY DELICIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan T. Craighead

Susan T. Craighead Craighead Law, LLC484 Barnsdale DriveMarietta, GA 30068

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CookiesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 26, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 4, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 4, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 18, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2010WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2010WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 17, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance