USPTO serial 78426224
INTEGRATED SOLUTION NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGRATED SOLUTION NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business process re-engineering services; Business management consultation and consulting services primarily used to consult to customer service providers, other consultants, trainers, professional service agents or other service delivery parties interested in creating business processes according to a specific service model called the Integrated Solution Network; This service model addresses how to manage and balance successful performance of customer service by creating relationships with customers that are easy to maintain and create valuable results; This service model creates business processes to address and answer incoming customer cases, tickets, service requests, questions or inquiries based on specific pre-configured and regulated business parameters composed of, but not limited to, knowledge management principles and practices, customer relationship management principles and practices, collaborator profiles and roles, expertise management, expertise reputation and workload prioritizaiton | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2003 |
| 042 | Technology consultation in the field of Knowledge Management; Technology consultation in the field of Customer Relationship Management (CRM); Design for others in the field of [Knowledge Management software]; and Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of Knowledge Management software primarily used to consult to customer service providers, other consultants, trainers, professional service agents or other service delivery parties interested in creating business processes according to a specific service model called the Integrated Solution Network; This service model addresses how to manage and balance successful performance of customer service by creating relationships with customers that are easy to maintain and create valuable results; This service model creates business processes to address and answer incoming customer cases, tickets, service requests, questions or inquiries based on specific pre-configured and regulated business parameters composed of, but not limited to, knowledge management principles and practices, customer relationship management principles and practices, collaborator profiles and roles, expertise management, expertise reputation and workload prioritizaiton | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |