Drawing for NUTRI-RUSH

USPTO serial 78426263

NUTRI-RUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NUTRI-RUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffery J. Crandall, P.A.

JEFFERY J CRANDALL PA JEFFERY J CRANDALL PA1859 N LAKEWOOD DR STE 104COEUR D'ALENE, ID 83814-2661UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Bottled water, namely, flavored water and purified water; sports drinksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 4, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 4, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 21, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 23, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 4, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance