Drawing for MTVU WOODY AWARDS

USPTO serial 78426384

MTVU WOODY AWARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MTVU WOODY AWARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph Molko

JOSEPH MOLKO C/O ANTHONY ORTIZ 1515 BRAODWAY 51ST FLOVIACOM INTERNATIONAL INCNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing televised awards show highlighting outstanding achievements in the area of independent/college rock music and culture featuring live action, clips, animation, comedy and drama; providing information in the field of entertainment by means of a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2005ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 18, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Aug 9, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Aug 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance