Drawing for PMOVERSIGHT

USPTO serial 78426430

PMOVERSIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PMOVERSIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard E. Nawracaj

RICHARD E NAWRACAJ ENTWISTLE & CAPPUCCI LLP333 W WACKER DR 20TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use as a spreadsheet and for calculating, that uses a collection of rules, best practices and facts, organized and sorted into a proprietary scheme, to measure and enhance the functionality, operation and/or execution of tasks and assignmentsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 12, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 12, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 20, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 10, 2006OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 15, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 26, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 19, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance