USPTO serial 78426830
WIRELESS VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2006
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WIRELESS VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.
Austin, TX
Other trademarks owned by Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.
Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.
Austin, TX
Other trademarks owned by Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.
Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.
Austin, TX
Other trademarks owned by Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILANA S HANDLER
PHILANA S HANDLER WHITHAM CURTIS & CHRISTOFFERSON PC11491 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 340RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; computer software for design, deployment, management and maintenance of wireless networks and for asset management and maintenance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | educational and training services, namely conducting lectures and short courses in the field of wireless networks and distributing course materials in connection therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | consulting services in the field of design and implementation of wireless networks for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WIRELESS VALLEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |