USPTO serial 78426885
CAPE BOD*
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3690880Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 29, 2009
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAPE BOD*?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert F. Muse
ROBERT F MUSE LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT F MUSE439 CHESTNUT HILL AVEBROOKLINE, MA 02445UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | t-shirts and caps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |