Drawing for RIGEN THE REVOLUTION OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE

USPTO serial 78427082

RIGEN THE REVOLUTION OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RIGEN THE REVOLUTION OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Human biomedical molecular diagnostic testing servicesABANDONEDMay 24, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 24, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 24, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 23, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 21, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance