USPTO serial 78427130
KARNDEAN FLOORSTYLE INTERACTIVE FLOOR DESIGN PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4437849Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 26, 2013
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KARNDEAN FLOORSTYLE INTERACTIVE FLOOR DESIGN PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Peachtree International Limited
Hamilton HM, MX, BM
Peachtree International Limited
Hamilton HM, MX, BM
Peachtree International Limited
Hamilton HM, MX, BM
EXPORT, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc E. Fineman
Marc E. Fineman Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC2 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1300Chicago, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Hard surface covering for floors; vinyl floor coverings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Peachtree International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Peachtree International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Peachtree International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by KARNDEAN INTERNATIONAL LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named KARNDEAN FLOORSTYLE INTERACTIVE FLOOR DESIGN PROGRAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |