USPTO serial 78427133
JETEYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JETEYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mani Adeli
MANI ADELI STATTLER JOHANSEN ADELI LLP540 UNIVERSITY AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and downloadable online computer software, namely providing software interfaces to create on-line information services; providing software interfaces on physical media to create on-line information services; software interfaces for search engines; software for data mining from computer networks, featuring text, electronic documents, databases, and graphics and audiovisual information; software for obtaining data on a global computer network; software for creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing advertising and multi-media images through computer networks for use on web pages; computerized data base management services, namely providing online directories, indices, and searchable databases | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing multiple user access to proprietary collections of information by means of global computer information networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services and online computer services, namely providing web-based on-line information creation services; providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, which includes search engines and on-line web links to other web sites; data mining from computer networks, featuring text, electronic documents, databases, and graphics and audiovisual information; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks; acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating searchable databases of information and data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JetEye Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by JetEye Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named JETEYE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |