Drawing for VENDIMO

USPTO serial 78427148

VENDIMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VENDIMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence J. Crain

LAWRENCE J CRAIN GREER, BURNS & CRAIN LTD300 S WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded computer software and computer programs within the field of enterprise, manufacturing, business, service management and asset management solutions for the organization and analysis of customer behavior, personal data and product inquiries to enable enterprises to better assist individual customers; pre-recorded optical and magnetic data discs, smart cards and integrated circuit cards for software applications within the field of enterprise, manufacturing, business, service management and asset management solutions for the organization and analysis of customer behavior, personal data and product inquiries to enable enterprises to better assist individual customers; downloadable electronic manuals and instructions sold together as a unitACTIVE—
016Manuals and instruction pamphlets made of paper for guidance on software and hardware functions and for troubleshooting computer software and hardwareACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely maintenance and updating of computer software; computer software and computer hardware design; computer programming and computer systems analysis; consultancy in the field of computer technology, namely software design and maintenance; installation of software and software systems excluding computer hardwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2005GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance