USPTO serial 78427207
ORBITAL DATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORBITAL DATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth A. Walker
Elizabeth A. Walker Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates EllisOne Lincoln StreetState Street Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in providing predictable application response time over any type of network; computer software that reduces application response time; computer software for use in delivering applications over networks; computer software for use in prioritizing application delivery over networks; computer software that creates policies to manage applications; computer software for network management and for managing policies for applications that manage networks; computer software to control and manage network flow; computer hardware; computer peripherals; computer appliance in the nature of computer hardware for use in accelerating network transfers, providing predictable application response time over any type of network, reducing application response time, delivering applications over networks, prioritizing application delivery over networks, creating policies to manage applications, managing networks, and controlling and managing network flow | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, webinars, conferences, and workshops in the field of computers, computer networks, and computer software, and distributing course materials in connection therewith, and all in the fields of accelerating networks transfers, providing predictable application response time over any type of network, reducing application response time, delivering applications over networks, prioritizing application delivery over networks, creating policies to manage applications, managing networks, and controlling and managing network flow | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, computer consultation services; computer network design for others; computer programming for others; computer software consultation; computer software development for others; computer systems analysis for others; and customization of computer hardware and software network flow, and all in the fields of accelerating network transfers, providing predictable application response time over any type of network, reducing application response time delivering applications over networks, prioritizing application delivery over networks, creating policies to manage applications, managing networks, and controlling and managing network flow | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Orbital Data Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Orbital Data Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ORBITAL DATA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |